|
Testing/Benchmarking
Here's a quick look
at the system that I'll be testing the Sapphire 4850 Toxic video
card in.
|
Motherboard:
|
Gigabyte GA-EP45-DQ6 |
| CPU:
|
Core2Duo E8400 @
3.6GHz |
| Memory:
|
2GB Patriot
PC2-9600 @ 1066 |
| Power
Supply: |
Tuniq MiniPlant 950w |
| Storage:
|
2 x 750GB Hitachi
HDD RAID 0 |
| Optical:
|
Lite-On 20X DVD+/-RW
+DL |
| Operating
System: |
Windows Vista
Ultimate (SP1) |
The test system is an
all-in-all pretty well rounded system that isn't overbalanced in any
one direction. While using an Intel Core2Extreme Quad core CPU
(which would cost more than the rest of the system combined) would
be a way to guarantee we weren't maxxing out the CPU during any of
the tests, most of the games are going to give real-world tests. So
my goal was to try and show what kind of results you could obtain
from a system that could be built on a reasonable budget with other
mid-range components. We're looking to build a capable gaming
machine without breaking the budget.
Overclocking
As always, overclocking the
video card is an At Your Own Risk adventure. There have been mixed
success stories of people overclocking their 4800 series cards and
the most successful has come by way of mods to the cards themselves.
Mods such as flashing the BIOS of the card with different voltage
and clock speed settings, and a popular "100k ohm resistor
mod" have yielded some pretty extreme results. The downside to these
methods - your warranty is voided immediately.
The ATI Overdrive tool in
the Catalyst Control Center is the quickest and least invasive means
to control clock speeds via adjustable sliders. Unfortunately,
it is rather limited. For those who wish to let the Overdrive
utility do the work for you, there is an automatic configuration
utility which will test the card and determine its highest and most
stable overclock. Again, the utility has its shortcomings because it
was not able to read the GPU temperature of the Sapphire 4850 Toxic.
The sliders maximum values
gave us a GPU core speed of 700Mhz and a memory clock speed of
1200Mhz. Even though those settings passed the utilities own self
test, they did not work once benchmarking began. In the end, it
comes down to the same old "Your Mileage May Vary" disclaimer. What
I was able to find was achieve was a core clock speed of 700Mhz, but
the memory speed wouldn't budge from its stock setting of 1150.
While it can be a little disheartening not getting much of an
overclock out of the memory, we have to remember that the card is
already overclocked from the reference design. I'm glad to see
another 25Mhz out of the core!

The
Windows Vista Performance meter is a rather simple yet effective way
to scale out the software requirements versus your hardware
capabilities. So far, 5.9 is the highest rating I've seen any
sub-system achieve and the overall score is basically the score of
the lowest component. In our case, that would be the CPU with a 5.8
- so the overall score for this system is a 5.8. But these scores
show us we should expect no issues from the graphics card running
the Windows Aero desktop.
.gif)
Futuremark's
3DMark2006 and 3DMark Vanatage will get cracks at the first run
of synthetic benchmarks for the Sapphire 4850 Toxic.
3DMark06
|
Resolution |
Score Cataory |
Score
Results
(Stock) |
Results
(OC) |
| 1280 x
1024 |
Total 3D Mark Score |
13,114
3D Marks |
13,466
3D Marks |
| |
GT1: Return to Proxycon |
39.259 fps |
40.842 fps |
| |
GT2: Firefly
Forest |
50.315 fps |
51.895 fps |
| |
HDR1: Canyon
Flight |
58.720 fps |
61.082 fps |
|
HDR2: Deep Freeze |
68.562 fps |
71.310 fps |
| 1400 x
1050 |
Total 3D Mark Score |
12,768
3D Marks |
12,977
3D Marks |
| |
GT1: Return to Proxycon |
38.358 fps |
39.389 fps |
| |
GT2: Firefly
Forest |
49.039 fps |
49.895 fps |
| |
HDR1: Canyon
Flight |
56.317fps |
57.850 fps |
|
HDR2: Deep Freeze |
64.997 fps |
68.308 fps |
| 1600 x
1200 |
Total 3D Mark
Score |
11,856
3D Marks |
12,094
3D Marks |
| |
GT1: Return to Proxycon |
35.3973 fps |
37.086 fps |
| |
GT2: Firefly Forest |
45.752 fps |
46.770 fps |
| |
HDR1: Canyon Flight |
50.973 fps |
52.263 fps |
|
HDR2: Deep
Freeze |
56.985 fps |
58.606 fps |
| 1600 x
1050 |
Total 3D Mark
Score |
12,129
3D Marks |
12,379
3D Marks |
| |
GT1: Return to Proxycon |
36.724 fps |
37.659 fps |
| |
GT2: Firefly Forest |
46.478 fps |
47.909 fps |
|
HDR1: Canyon Flight |
52.832 fps |
54.045 fps |
|
HDR2: Deep
Freeze |
59.435 fps |
61.124 fps |
| 1920 x
1200 |
Total 3D Mark
Score |
11,062
3D Marks |
11,289
3D Marks |
|
GT1: Return to Proxycon |
36.724 fps |
33.910 fps |
| |
GT2: Firefly Forest |
46.478 fps |
43.834 fps |
|
HDR1: Canyon Flight |
46.526 fps |
47.790 fps |
|
HDR2: Deep
Freeze |
51.189 fps |
52.620 fps |
The overclocked GPU core at 700 Mhz
worked on each and every benchmark!
3D Mark
Vantage
|
Test Details |
Test Catagory |
Results
(Stock) |
Results
(OC) |
|
Entry
|
Total 3D Mark Score |
E16,125 |
E16,644 |
| |
GPU Test 1 |
89.04 fps |
90.92 |
| |
GPU Test 2 |
76.01 fps |
78.16 |
|
Performance |
Total 3D Mark Score |
P6,844 |
P7,168 |
| |
GPU Test 1 |
19.38 fps |
20.61 fps |
|
GPU
Test 2 |
20.58 fps |
21.39 fps |
|
High: |
Total 3D Mark Score |
H4,531 |
H4,776 |
| |
GPU Test 1 |
12.79 fps |
13.59 fps |
|
GPU Test 2 |
12.14 fps |
12.8 fps |
|
Extreme: |
Total 3D Mark Score |
X3,108 |
X3,245 |
| |
GPU Test 1 |
9.6 fps |
10.13 fps |
| |
GPU Test 2 |
8.05 fps |
8.32 fps |
|