|
Crysis
Everyone has an opinion on Crysis.....and my opinion is, regardless
of what you think of the game play, the game makes a killer
benchmark. For Quadfire testing, we follow a similar test
methodology as the
4870 X2, only in this case, we are limiting the testing to
1680x1050 and 1920x1200.

(click the above picture for a larger
version)
Perhaps the biggest surprise of all, the one
test that has consistently been poor for ATi has actually the
biggest results for actual in game testing. Not that it means
a whole lot, since the other games have zero Quadfire scaling.
In the case of Crysis, the scaling improves as the resolution and AA
is increased, giving us a best case scenario of 0% change in minimum
frame rate, 7.7% increase in average frame rate, and just shy of 25%
in the maximum frame rate. It is better, but not what I would
consider ideal.
Overclocking the CPU helps too, putting us just
over 35FPS for 1920/8xAA, and just under 50 FPS for maximum
frame rate. Refer to the data table below for exact figures:
|
Single |
Quadfire |
Quadfire w/4GHz |
|
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
Min |
Max |
Avg |
| 1680, 0x |
22.21 |
47.75 |
35.96 |
20.98 |
50.54 |
34.82 |
|
|
|
| 1680, 2x |
21.47 |
44.53 |
34.43 |
20.4 |
48.85 |
33.97 |
|
|
|
| 1680, 4x |
21.49 |
43.14 |
33.73 |
20.45 |
50.53 |
33.86 |
|
|
|
| 1680, 8x |
21.64 |
44.16 |
34.42 |
20.55 |
48.9 |
34.1 |
|
|
|
| 1920, 0x |
21.78 |
40.87 |
33.53 |
20.58 |
48.36 |
33.88 |
|
|
|
| 1920, 2x |
21.06 |
37.18 |
31.31 |
19.8 |
45.23 |
32.71 |
|
|
|
| 1920, 4x |
21.18 |
36.04 |
29.97 |
19.89 |
46.42 |
32.29 |
|
|
|
| 1920, 8x |
20.93 |
37.65 |
31.3 |
19.86 |
46.86 |
32.58 |
21.59 |
48.83 |
35.51 |
|