|


Here is a quick view of the top and sides of the unit. I am
always a big fan of manufacturers that leave the sides clear of
markings for a clean installed look. The finish is a nice
glossy black that definitely looks better in person.

Here is a closer look at the Hexflo mesh back surface. The two
vertical metal lines shown at left and just off center are two of
the three heatsinks used to cool the system. These are quite
small for a normal unit but with just 700 W to cool, they may be
enough.
The Install:
I installed the Sigma SP-700 into my AMD build using an ABIT
Fatal1ty AN9 32X Motherboard based on the Force 590 SLI chipset.
The build
includes an AMD Athlon AM2 5600+, two 8800 GT cards in SLI and a 4
GB kit of Mushkin XP2-6400 modules.
Storage was provided by both 160 GB and 250 GB Maxtor SATA II drives
and a Lite-on 16x DVD burner all mounted in the NZXT Tempest case.
|
Hardware |
Model |
|
Operating System: |
MS Windows Vista Ultimate
(64-bit) |
|
Motherboard: |
ABIT Fatal1ty AN9 32X |
|
CPU |
AMD AM2 5600+ |
|
Memory |
2x 2 GB kit of
Mushkin
XP2-6400 |
|
Graphics |
BFG 8800 GT OC |
|
Power Supply |
Sigma SP-700 |
|
Drives |
160 and 250
GB Maxtor SATA II, 16X Lite-on DVD Burner |

The SP-700's extra cable length had no trouble handling the inverted
design of the NZXDT Tempest though I did have to run a couple of
rails across the board. Here you can see how clean the install
looks with no annoying stickers to mar the outside surface on my
windowed install. Now we just need to add the Velcro cable
ties and we are in business.

To
test the SP-700 I ran the system overnight idle before capturing
these numbers using the ABIT uGuru. With the test build
featuring a single AM2 processor and a set of 8800 GT video
cards, the build is representative of a large percentage of the
gaming builds out there today. Using the Power
distribution and overall Wattage as a guide, this also
represents about the highest build I would comfortably be
looking at a 700W power supply for as well.
Although the rails exhibited some movement at
idle, everything remained in spec.
Testing (Load):
Next I put the build
under load by running
Stress Prime
2004, better known as Orthos and
Futuremark's 3DMark Vantage simultaneously in two back to
back sessions before capturing the following:

As you can see the numbers look remarkably
similar. I did again experience some little droops in
power during testing when validating with my trusty multi-meter
but over all the variance remained well within the spec.

To further test the rails I fired up the
system to the BIOS and rechecked the 12 Volt rails with my
trusty Cen-Tech multi-tester. While the multi-meter is no
oscilloscope; I noticed only very minor changes in voltage.
I also kept the Multi-tester up during an hour session of Team
Fortress 2 but never noticed any major variance.
Conclusion:
The Sigma SP-700 is definitely a more subdued design that the Sigma
Shark model we last reviewed. With the SP-700 we have a no
frills design that is clearly targeted at keeping things simple.
During testing the SP-700 was quiet enough to not be heard over the
two video cards as well. I was initially nervous about the
size of both the unit and the heatsinks but during testing the
exhaust never got overly hot.
The Sigma SP-700 is not the most stable power supply we have tested
with some very minor movement in both the 12V rails and the 3.3V
rails even while idle but the variance was never large or out of
spec. This is not abnormal but stability and consistency of
the rails is critical to any overclocking effort. With a price
point in the $100 range, the Sigma SP-700 faces some tough
competition from the big boys on the market. As the prices
come down I would expect the 700W power supplies to become a bargain
hunter's dream, keep that in mind when shopping for the SP-700.
|
 |
| Performance: |
3 out of 5 | |
Innovation: |
3 out of 5 | |
Quality: |
3 out of 5 | |
Stability: |
3 out of 5 |
| Aesthetics: |
4 out of 5 | |
Software/Drivers Pack: |
N/A |
|
Overclocking: |
N/A |
|
Value: |
3 out of 5 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | Project Skill Level (5 being most difficult) | 3
out of 5 |

|