|
Enermax ECO80+ 620W PSU Review
Features:
-
24/7 @ 40C operation capable
-
MAGMA Fan uses Batwing Blades
to improve airflow by 20-30% and a Twister Bearing to reduce
noise by 1-2 dBA
-
Safeguard utilizes OCP, OVP,
UVP AC, UVP DC, OPP, OTP, SIP and SCP.
Specifications:

| Input Voltage |
100-240VAC, 50-60Hz, with
Active PFC (Maximum operation range: 90-265VAC) |
| Input Current |
9.5A-4A(620W) |
| Temperature |
Operation ambient: 0~40C/32~104F
Storage ambient: -40~70C/-40~158F |
| Humidity |
Operation: to 85% relative humidity,
non-condensing at 25C
Storage: to 95% relative humidity, non-condensing at 50C
|
| Cooling |
One 12 cm axial fan, 2 ball-bearing,
500~2000RPM (±10% ) @ 40C ambient,
speed auto controlled. |
| MTBF |
Greater than 100,000 hours at 70% of full
rated load, 230VAC/50Hz, 25 oC ambient. (MIL-HDBK-217F
standard)
|
| Weight |
1.6 kg (400W/500W) / 1.8kg (620W),
without modular cables
|
| EMC |
CE, FCC, MIC
|
| Safety |
UL, cUL, TUV, BSMI, CB, CCC, GOST
|
Testing:
In order to effectively test
the ECO80+ 620W, we installed it into what we consider to be a
typical system for this class of power supply. We will take a
look at both idle and load numbers, both in software and with a DMM.
Below is the system we used:
| CPU: |
AMD Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition @
3.8GHz |
| Motherboard: |
Gigabyte GA-MA790FXT-UD5P |
| GPU: |
Sapphire 4890 Vapor-X 2GB |
| RAM: |
2x2GB Corsair Dominator XMS3 DHX
DDR3-1600, CAS 9 |
| Sound: |
Onboard |
| Cooling: |
EK-Supreme, Swiftech MCP655, MCR-320 |
Our main test test uses the popular software OCCT, which stresses
the CPU and the GPU simultaneously, and then graphs the voltages
over the period of an hour. Below are the graphs for 3.3V, 5V,
and 12V rails:

In the above graph, the green line represents the CPU load, and the
brown line represents the actual voltage measurement. In the
case of the 3.3V rail, there is very little variance. The rail
wiggles a little bit when idle, however the lowest value measured 3.3V, and at max measured 3.31V, all well
within the defined spec.

The 5V rail was very stable, showing a minimum of 5.05V and a
maximum of 5.075V, meaning the rail was rock solid through testing.

The 12V rail was less stable,
with an obvious difference between idle and load. This is
largely because the 12V rail is what is responsible for powering
both the GPU and the CPU, meaning the load is much more stressful on
this rail as opposed to the other rails. The lowest value
measured was 12.225V, while the highest value measured was 12.35V.
During the load portion of the
test, the 12V showed a variance of roughly 50mV, well within the
spec of 100mV. It could be less, but it is difficult to tell
without a more thorough hardware testing platform.
Because software testing
doesn't have the best visibility to the actual voltage measurement
coming from the power supply, I like to confirm results with a DMM.
To do this, I measure the 12V rail in one of the PCI-e plugs as it
is plugged into the video card. I measure at idle when the
system is sitting at the desktop, and then again during the OCCT
stress test. In both cases the probing is done for several
minutes to look for any variation. Here are the results:
| 12V Idle |
12.32V |
| 12V Load |
12.25V |
As you can see, the DMM
confirms what OCCT sees nearly perfectly. The rail is a little
on the high side, but well within spec.
|