|
Bus Speed |
Memory Timings
CAS / RAS to CAS / RAS / Cycle
Time |
Voltage |
Sandra Score |
CPU Speed |
| 200 (DDR:400) |
2.5 /
3 / 2 / 5 |
2.5V |
4748 / 4764 |
2800 MHz |
|
200 (DDR:400) |
2.5 / 2 / 2 / 5 |
2.8V |
4759 /
4760 |
2800 MHz |
217 (DDR:434)
Default |
2.5 / 3 / 2 / 6
Intel Chipset
Recommended |
2.8V |
5176 / 5192 |
3038 MHz |
|
217 (DDR:434) |
2.5 / 3 / 2 / 5 |
2.8V |
5164 / 5197 |
3038 MHz |
|
217 (DDR:434) |
2.5 / 2 / 2 / 5 |
2.8V |
5211 / 5215 |
3038 MHz |
| 234 (DDR:468) |
2.5 / 3 / 2 / 5
|
2.8V |
FAIL |
3276 MHz |
| 234 (DDR:468) |
3 / 2 / 2
/ 5 |
2.8V |
5628 /
5594 |
3276 MHz |
| 250 (DDR:500) |
3 / 2 / 2 / 5 |
2.8V |
FAIL |
3500 Mhz |
|
250 (DDR:500) |
3 / 3 / 2 / 5 |
2.8V |
6014 / 6000 |
3500 MHz |
255
(DDR:510)
Highest Stable FSB |
3 / 2 / 3
/ 6
Most Aggressive Settings
Stable |
2.8V |
6135 /
6071 |
3569 MHz |
Buffered
memory bandwidth scores break through the 6000 mark with a 250MHz Front Side
Bus. Easily topping what PC4000 with typical timings (3/4/4/8) is capable of.
The OCZ PC3500 EB Platinum was only able to maintain stability up to a 255 MHz
front side bus. Considering that this is 38MHz over the certified rating
and allowing us to run the 2.8"C" processor at 3500MHz, I would call that a
very successful overclock. This is punctuated by CAS timings that are nearly
identical to the recommended Intel chipset values!

A
visual aid to bring the situation into perspective. The PC3200 was
running asynchronously at 5:4 (250:200) with latency values of 2/3/2/6.
The PC4000 was running synchronously with the CPU bus, but at timings
which are very typical for that speed of ram; 3/4/4/8. The OCZ PC3500EB
"Platinum" was also running synchronously on a 250MHZ front side bus,
but with the most aggressive timings (3/3/2/5). System Stability was
verified using Prime95 which was allowed to run for four hours, during
which time there were zero errors and zero warnings.
Conclusion
Memory that is capable of running
on a 250MHz bus and with timings that offer this much performance
gain has to be expensive right? I'm not going to so bold as to say that
"it's cheap" but it certainly won't make you're heart stop either. A 1
Gigabyte Dual-Channel kit (as of May 26th) carries a retail price of
$310 which comes in about $30 more than a 1 Gigabyte Dual-channel kit of
name brand PC4000 with timings of: 3/4/4/8. Even if you aren't one of
the most dedicated Overclockers, the price to performance ratio makes
this an EASY decision. Granted, the RAM topped out with a maximum front
side bus of 255Mhz which may be quite limiting for folks looking to
Overclock processors such as the 2.4"C" or 2.6"C" for maximum front side
bus potential. However, the higher multiplier carrying processors such
as the 2.8 and the 3.0 are being utilized quite a bit more these days in
newer systems, and they have a very solid chance of reaching somewhere
in the 240s with quite a few hitting the "250" mark.
Unquestionably, the OCZ PC3500 Enhanced Bandwidth "Platinum" DDR Ram is
among the best RAM that I have ever tested.
|
Club
Overclocker Rating |
|
Innovation: |
9.0
out of 10 |
|
Performance: |
10 out of 10 |
|
Quality: |
10 out of 10 |
|
Stability: |
10 out of 10 |
|
Overclocking: |
10 out of 10 |
|
Software Pack: |
N/A |
|
Value: |
9.0 out of 10 |
|
Overall Rating 9.0 |
|
|
|
|
Skill Level |
|
Project Skill Level
(10 being hardest) |
2
out of 10 |

|