|
Testing
Testing the Nexstar 3
consisted of installing an 1.5TB SATA, 7200RPM 3.5" Seagate
Barracuda hard drive and
running HDTune and HDTach to compare transfer speeds.
Results
In order to get a good gauge of the
enclosure's performance, we will compare it to that of a native,
internal SATA port.
HDTach Internal SATA:
The Seagate Barracuda is a killer performing drive, and the internal
SATA port turns out stellar performance, with throughput hitting just
under 140 MB/s and burst speeds at 246.6 MB/s. It will be very
interesting to see how the enclosure fares in comparison.
HD Tach eSATA:

The eSATA port on the NexStar enclosure shows a
similar performance curve except that the peak is capped at 110MB/s as
opposed to the near 140MB/s that we saw on the native controller.
Burst speeds are at 127.1 MB/s.
HD Tach FireWire 800:

Here is the HDTach
numbers for the FireWire 800. Not surprisingly, performance is
capped at 80 MB/s, with a burst speed of 85.1 MB/s. The 1394A port
on the card gave us identical performance numbers as well. This is
as expected; a native FireWire 400 port will run at half the speed of
this.
HD Tach USB 2.0:

Finally, we have the USB 2.0 test. As universal
as USB 2.0, it is definitely showing its age, with an average bandwidth
of 37.2MB/s.
Next up is our HD Tune numbers. HD Tune is
another test that gauges the bandwidth and latency as well.
HD Tune Internal SATA:

First up is the internal SATA test. In this
test, we saw an average bandwidth of 100 MB/s, and seek time of 13.6ms.
HD Tune eSATA:

Next is the eSATA test. Just like the HD Tach test, HD
Tune shows a peak of around 100MB/s, with an average of 92.7MB/s.
Seek time was the same at 13.5ms.
HD Tune FireWire 800:

HDTune again verifies our HD Tach findings.
FireWire 800 is capped to around 75MB/s for average bandwidth, and a
13.5ms seek time.
HD Tune USB 2.0:

HD Tune also shows us the limitations of USB 2.0, with
an average bandwidth of 33.2 MB/s and a 13.6ms seek latency.
Conclusion
Vantec shows once again that they build some pretty
awesome storage solutions, and the new NexStar is no exception.
The NexStar offers a huge advantage by supporting every major external
connection interface there is, all with excellent performance. On top of
that, installation is a snap, the build quality is great, and the looks
are absolutely killer. But that comes at a price. With a
retail price tag of $90, this is easily the highest priced external
enclosure with this level of features. However, you get what you
pay for, and I have had my fair share of cheap plastic enclosures that
break in no time; I am confident that won't happen here. On the
other hand, the older Vantec NexStar 3 (360UFS-BK) is much cheaper and only lacks the 1394B
capability. With more motherboards including eSATA as a standard,
and the ease of converting SATA to eSATA, I would have to say that the
older Vantec gets my recommendation with the exception of those users
that have a specific need for 1394B.
|
 |
| Performance: |
5 out of 5 | |
Innovation: |
4 out of 5 | |
Quality: |
5 out of 5 | |
Stability: |
N/A |
| Aesthetics: |
5 out of 5 | |
Software/Drivers Pack: |
N/A |
|
Overclocking: |
N/A |
|
Value: |
3 out of 5 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | Project Skill Level (5 being most difficult) |
1
out of 5 |

|