|

Rendering and Encoding Tests
Next up are the rendering and encoding tests.
For this, we are going to look at Cinebench, POV-Ray, and
x.264-480p.
Cinebench 10
Cinebench 10 is a very well known rendering
benchmark that can utilize a single CPU, multiple CPUs, or even
GPUs. For this test, we used Cinebench 10 64-bit, looking at
both single threaded and multi-threaded performance. Higher
scores are better.

For the single threaded test, the stock X4 955
beats out the stock x3360 by 400 points, however, the per-clock
advantage lies with the x3360, and thus it takes over the lead in
the max overclock test by 500 points.

In the multithreaded version of the test, the
stock 955 takes out the x3360 by 1650 points, but again loses in
both the per-clock test and the max overclock test.
POV-Ray
POV-Ray is another popular rendering benchmark
that also supports both single and multiple threads. Test
results are measured in Pixels Per Second, and a higher score is
better. For this test, we used version 3.7 beta 29.

The PovRay test seems to favor the AMD
architecture a little better than Cinebench does, as the X4 955
takes a slim lead in the per-clock test. Again, the stock 955
does a pretty good job of taking down the stock x3360.

In the multi-threaded version of POV-Ray, it is
again a close call between the x3360 and the X4 955 in the per-clock
test. In the stock comparison, the X4 955 again takes down the
Intel chip by 400 points.
X.264 Encoding Test
Finally, we have the X.264 encoding test. In
this test, a small video file is encoded into the H.264 format.
There are 5 runs that get two passes each; since each run typically
performs identically to the other 4, we are just going to report
both passes of the first run. Higher scores are better.


In the X.264 first test, the overclocked X4 955 takes the overall
lead, even over the 4GHz x3360. Again, at stock the 955 easily
keeps the x3360 at bay. In the second pass, the x3360 retakes
the lead when overclocked, but still is no contest at stock speeds.
|